The ethics of Socrates is briefly outlined.
The Latin form elenchus plural elenchi is used in English as the technical philosophical term. According to Vlastos,  it has the following steps: Socrates then argues, and the interlocutor agrees, that these further premises imply the contrary of the original thesis; in this case, it leads to: One elenctic examination can lead to a new, more refined, examination of the concept being considered, in this case it invites an examination of the claim: Most Socratic inquiries consist of a series of elenchi and typically end in puzzlement known as aporia.
Having shown that a proposed thesis is false is insufficient to conclude that some other competing thesis must be true. Rather, the interlocutors have reached aporiaan improved state of still not knowing what to say about the subject under discussion. The exact nature of the elenchus is subject to a great deal of debate, in particular concerning whether it is a positive method, leading to knowledge, or Socrates theory of knowledge negative method used solely to refute false claims to knowledge.
Guthrie in The Greek Philosophers sees it as an error to regard the Socratic method as a means by which one seeks the answer to a problem, or knowledge. Guthrie writes, "[Socrates] was accustomed to say that he did not himself know anything, and that the only way in which he was wiser than other men was that he was conscious of his own ignorance, while they were not.
The essence of the Socratic method is to convince the interlocutor that whereas he thought he knew something, in fact he does not. Such an examination challenged the implicit moral beliefs of the interlocutors, bringing out inadequacies and inconsistencies in their beliefs, and usually resulting in aporia.
In view of such inadequacies, Socrates himself professed his ignorance, but others still claimed to have knowledge.
Socrates believed that his awareness of his ignorance made him wiser than those who, though ignorant, still claimed knowledge. While this belief seems paradoxical at first glance, it in fact allowed Socrates to discover his own errors where others might assume they were correct.
This claim was known by the anecdote of the Delphic oracular pronouncement that Socrates was the wisest of all men.
Or, rather, that no man was wiser than Socrates. Socrates used this claim of wisdom as the basis of his moral exhortation. Accordingly, he claimed that the chief goodness consists in the caring of the soul concerned with moral truth and moral understanding, that "wealth does not bring goodness, but goodness brings wealth and every other blessing, both to the individual and to the state", and that "life without examination [dialogue] is not worth living".
It is with this in mind that the Socratic method is employed. Socrates rarely used the method to actually develop consistent theories, instead using myth to explain them. Instead of arriving at answers, the method was used to break down the theories we hold, to go "beyond" the axioms and postulates we take for granted.
Therefore, myth and the Socratic method are not meant by Plato to be incompatible; they have different purposes, and are often described as the "left hand" and "right hand" paths to good and wisdom.
Socratic Circles[ edit ] A Socratic Circle also known as a Socratic Seminar is a pedagogical approach based on the Socratic method and uses a dialogic approach to understand information in a text. Its systematic procedure is used to examine a text through questions and answers founded on the beliefs that all new knowledge is connected to prior knowledge, that all thinking comes from asking questions, and that asking one question should lead to asking further questions.
The inner circle focuses on exploring and analysing the text through the act of questioning and answering.The most significant theories of Socrates include the theory of value, theory of knowledge, theory of human nature, theory of learning, theory of transmission, theory of society, theory of opportunity and theory of consensus.
Those who take the Dream Theory to be concerned with propositional knowledge include Ryle 27– “from onwards Plato concentrates on ‘know’ (connaître): [Socrates' Dream] is a logician's theory, a theory about the composition of truths and falsehoods.”. The one thing Socrates claimed to have knowledge of was "the art of love" (ta erôtik in Western philosophy returned in full force with the Renaissance and the Age of Reason in Europe when political theory began to resurface under those like Locke and Hobbes.
The ethics of Socrates is briefly outlined. If knowledge can be learned, so can virtue. Thus, Socrates states virtue can be taught.
He believes “the unexamined life is not worth living.” One must seek knowledge and wisdom before private interests.
If Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytical theory is correct, we are often unaware of. The Socratic method, also known as maieutics, method of elenchus, elenctic method, or Socratic debate, is a form of cooperative argumentative dialogue between individuals, based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions.
It is a dialectical method, involving a discussion in which the defense of one point of view is. The Theory of Recollection suggests the beginning of a way to make sense of the method Socrates pursues in the early dialogues.
According to the theory, some knowledge belongs to "reason." It is not acquired in "experience.".